Today: Thursday 24 June 2021 , 2:55 am


advertisment
search




Requests for adminship NHRHS2010 2

Last updated 9 Day , 10 hour 40 Views

Advertisement
In this page talks about ( Requests for adminship NHRHS2010 2 ) It was sent to us on 14/06/2021 and was presented on 14/06/2021 and the last update on this page on 14/06/2021

Your Comment


Enter code
 
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed.
Pedro User_talk:Pedro Chat 
10:31, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
  • ::When you reapply for RfA should not be a date set in stone. It should been when you feel you've properly addressed the concerns brought up in the two RfAs. Pedro's advice is sound. EVula
    // talk //

    //
    14:28, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose — Boricuaeddie sums it up perfectly. Matthew 08:43, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose per all the above concerns. --// talk //

    //
    14:28, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose Adminship is no big deal, RFA is even less of big deal. Candidate is taking this a little too seriously for my taste (BTW, Jaranda had 7 RfAs before getting the mop, so I wouldn't worry). Moreschi Talk 13:18, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
  • :Also, edit summaries like this, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/NHRHS2010_2&diff=154384609&oldid=154383840 this, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/NHRHS2010_2&diff=next&oldid=154381974 and this are over-the-top. Moreschi User talk:MoreschiTalk 14:46, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose per comments here and my limited interaction with this user through his recent BRFA. --ST47Talk·Desk 13:39, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
  • I don't think you are ready for the unpleasantness that being an administrator entails. I'm also concerned at the intense desire to become an administrator which I don't think is helpful. I would strongly suggest withdrawing for the time being and not setting any arbitrary time limits or scales on future nominations. Nick 13:46, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose due to lack of encyclopedia-building experience. Candidate has potential to eventually become an admin; I'd recommend focusing on substantial contributions to some articles. Majoreditor 14:52, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Neutral
    1. Neutral for now.
      Pedro  Chat 
      07:45, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

     
    Comments

    There are no Comments yet




    last seen
    Most vists