Today: Tuesday 15 June 2021 , 7:48 am


Requests for adminship Flubeca

Last updated 17 hour , 56 minute 38 Views

In this page talks about ( Requests for adminship Flubeca ) It was sent to us on 14/06/2021 and was presented on 14/06/2021 and the last update on this page on 14/06/2021

Your Comment

Enter code
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Flubeca
01:01, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: I intend to help with various tasks, such as AIV, CSD, AFD Closure, WP:UAA, Prods, or any other backlogged task. I would also keep an eye on the Administrator's Noticeboards/Incidents and Administrator's noticeboard/3 Revert Rule. I will continue doing the Vandalism Patrol, but with the ability to react faster to serial vandalism, or the really troublesome ones that come by. This would save me time, and maybe keep 3-4 pages from being vandalized.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A:I am most proud of my vandalism fighting, the time when I faught the hardest was my vandalism fighting night on July 4. There was a sudden rush of vandalism, I've never seen as much vandalism in my whole life. I worked until 4 am, I went to sleep after the vandalism calmed down. And got many thanks messages the next day.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:The closest thing I had to a conflist was on Victoria Cross (Canada) 's promotion to Good Article by Tarret. I had put the article on hold, and explained why on the article's talk page. Tarret then came and passed the article. I asked him why on his talk page, but he never answered me (I also think he deleted my message). I then went and asked users what to do on WP:GAC's talk page. I walked away from the situation afterwards. The situation was eventually resolved, the Victoria Cross (Canada) article was put on GAR by someone else, and delisted.

General comments

  • See Flubeca's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Flubecatalk page.

  • {{#ifeq:FlubecaFlubeca
    02:47, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
    1. :::Ok. A slightly less quick (500, instead of 50) look at your talk page contribs shows no signs of collaboration ever. I don't see any edits in your talk page history that show me that you've actually tried to work with other editors in the past to improve an article, the few that you do leave that aren't just dealing with talk page templates are generally about something you did to the article, and not real requests for input or help from other editors-- which again is evidenced by your most contributed talk page having only six edits. --
      02:52, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
    2. :::And it was still only a few days ago. I could understand if it was a month ago, but three days ago, combined with other things, is still very concerning. And I don't mean to be rude or offensive here, but your replies seem very much like you're trying to brown nose your way into adminship, which is also concerning. I'm sorry if you're just recognizing your faults, but as recent as they are they show no signs of improvement since then, even if they are sincere. --
      03:02, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
    3. Oppose per lack of overall experience.
      04:01, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
    4. Oppose. You may remember me as the one who welcomed you last December when you first came. I'm impressed by how much you've developed, but I would really like to see some sort of collaboration and general experience. bibliomaniac15 Prepare to be deleted! 04:26, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
    5. Oppose worried about question 2. Miranda 13:43, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
    6. Oppose per question 2, a general "doesn't get it".
      ~ Wikihermit
      14:18, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
    7. Oppose. The answer to Q. 2 shows a lack of experience, failure to recognize what the encyclopedia is about -- vandal-fighting is very important to the encyclopedia, but fighting vandalism shouldn't be one's whole focus while here. Xoloz 15:00, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Neutral, towards support per Boricuaeddie. Although I have no evidence that this user will abuse the mop, I'm kind of worried how this user will help out with conflicts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hirohisat (talk • contribs) {
  • The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
    Please do not modify it.
    Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.


    There are no Comments yet

    last seen
    Most vists