Today: Wednesday 4 August 2021 , 6:41 am


advertisment
search




Baruun-Urt

Last updated 2 Month , 8 Day 1 Views

Advertisement
In this page talks about ( Baruun-Urt ) It was sent to us on 28/05/2021 and was presented on 28/05/2021 and the last update on this page on 28/05/2021

Your Comment


Enter code
 
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Delete. Rje 18:03, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)

Baruun-Urt

Had its two weeks on Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English, no one's done anything with it. Topic is OK for an article (it's a place in Mongolia), but if there is anything useful here it needs to be translated. I think it's in Russian, despite the following anonymous remark on this and the (now copyvio'd) Erdenebulgan, Arhangay:
  • Both by the same unregistered IP. One has a link to a Mongolian website, so that may be the language. I flagged one with the new instead of the notenglish one. (I'm not sure what the difference is supposed to be.) 68.81.231.127 06:54, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Anyway, feel free to salvage but delete if left in present form. Oh, and the difference between instead of and is that the former is for things that are "mostly translated" and not candidates for deletion on that basis, but need further work. This should have been tagged . -- Jmabel Talk 00:34, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)
    This is the article that triggered the discussion leading to the current use of the template. I did change it to the notenglish template after that was resolved, so it has been flagged correctly for the requisite two weeks. 68.81.231.127 07:56, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

    • Delete, two weeks are two weeks. Wyss 02:13, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
    • Delete. This is not Russian or any Slavic language. It's probably Mongolian, which is also written in the Cyrillic alphabet. Time's up, chances of translation are low. -- Curps 02:48, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
    • Delete, article as it stands is un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 06:26, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
    • Delete. Carrp Talk 04:05, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
    • Delete. Christopher Welsh 00:08, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
    This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

     
    Comments

    There are no Comments yet

    last seen
    Most vists