Today: Wednesday 28 July 2021 , 10:24 am


advertisment
search




Jim Szwiec

Last updated 4 Month , 24 Day 3 Views

Advertisement
In this page talks about ( Jim Szwiec ) It was sent to us on 05/03/2021 and was presented on 05/03/2021 and the last update on this page on 05/03/2021

Your Comment


Enter code
 
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 07:10, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Jim Szwiec

Vanity. – flamurai (t) 11:08, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete vanity. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:07, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, Vanity. Inter 15:33, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, ditto. – Kpalion (talk) 16:34, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, vanity. Rje 17:44, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete, user test. Wyss 18:59, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, Wikipedian231 19:03, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, article does not establish notability, possible vanity. Megan1967 05:57, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete this article on this non-notable person. The only thing that comes to my mind is "So what?" and "Who cares?" Zzyzx11 08:10, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Enochlau 12:15, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

 
Comments

There are no Comments yet

last seen
Most vists